The media has confidently stated that Keir Starmer’s time as Prime Minister is over, yet they've forgotten to include any reasoning or a blueprint for how this will unfold. It's like announcing a party without mentioning where or when!

Journalists, in a show of unity, believe the UK is on the brink of a leadership change, though they haven't bothered with minor details like who might actually replace him. Columnist Thomas Logan quips, 'He’s lost the public and even the member for Hartlepool! Isn’t it obvious?' Meanwhile, the media is buzzing with excitement, despite a lack of clarity about the next steps.

Nathan Muir of Hitchin points out the glaring lack of the usual chaos that accompanies a Prime Minister's ousting – no legislative failures, no party revolts, no eager successors sharpening their knives. It's all very peculiar, he notes, like feeling that Iran is doing badly while Trump insists he's winning everywhere.

So, while the media might be having a field day, the rest of us are left speculating if this is just another case of 'fake it till you make it' in political reporting.